• This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn more.

Men Only Think Of One Thing.....

Status
Not open for further replies.

vince

Well-Known Member
#1
SEX!!!
Are we the only one?
What about the female gender?What do y'all think first when u lay ya eyes on some sexy dude?I WANNA HAVE HIS BABY!!As if that is not sex!!Hehehe!!
Seriously though,what is wrong with men seeing women as sexual objects?They do dress themselves up as such,don't they.
Y'all put us guys under serious pressure sometimes with all them sensuous bodily protrusions ala:
a)Boobs sticking out like a "one way" signboard.
b)Booties sticking out and wiggling at the back.
c)Maddeningly sensuously curvatious hips.
Y'all push these sinful anatomical landscape in our face and u expect us to think of something else but SEX.
TUFFIAKWA!!
Y'all like us thinking of u as sexual objects,don't y'all?ADMIT IT!! :imp :p
 

ngevergreen

Active Member
#2
vince said:
SEX!!!
Are we the only one?
What about the female gender?What do y'all think first when u lay ya eyes on some sexy dude?I WANNA HAVE HIS BABY!!As if that is not sex!!Hehehe!!
Seriously though,what is wrong with men seeing women as sexual objects?They do dress themselves up as such,don't they.
Y'all put us guys under serious pressure sometimes with all them sensuous bodily protrusions ala:
a)Boobs sticking out like a "one way" signboard.
b)Booties sticking out and wiggling at the back.
c)Maddeningly sensuously curvatious hips.
Y'all push these sinful anatomical landscape in our face and u expect us to think of something else but SEX.
TUFFIAKWA!!
Y'all like us thinking of u as sexual objects,don't y'all?ADMIT IT!! :imp :p
Heyy! it all depends on what u have at the back of ur mind. Coming to some dude's mode of dressing, I'm totally against their promiscous and seducive manner of dressing; but u guys can as well close ur eyes to an extent.
What do u say?
 

vince

Well-Known Member
#3
ngevergreen said:
Heyy! it all depends on what u have at the back of ur mind. Coming to some dude's mode of dressing, I'm totally against their promiscous and seducive manner of dressing; but u guys can as well close ur eyes to an extent.
What do u say?
First question,why should we close our eyes?
Second question,can the ladies,after "dressing to kill",stand being ignored?
We know you can't. :p
 

Shekua

Well-Known Member
#4
vince said:
First question,why should we close our eyes?
Second question,can the ladies,after "dressing to kill",stand being ignored?
We know you can't. :p
We have been created to always dress to kill (forgive me if you are a lady and don't believe in this) so seeing us in our dress to kill doesn't not mean we (i) need SEX, Not at all. A man's duty is to admire God's creation, that is all.
 

bluestocking

Well-Known Member
#5
vince said:
SEX!!!
Are we the only one?
What about the female gender?What do y'all think first when u lay ya eyes on some sexy dude?I WANNA HAVE HIS BABY!!As if that is not sex!!Hehehe!!
Seriously though,what is wrong with men seeing women as sexual objects?They do dress themselves up as such,don't they.
Y'all put us guys under serious pressure sometimes with all them sensuous bodily protrusions ala:
a)Boobs sticking out like a "one way" signboard.
b)Booties sticking out and wiggling at the back.
c)Maddeningly sensuously curvatious hips.
Y'all push these sinful anatomical landscape in our face and u expect us to think of something else but SEX.
TUFFIAKWA!!
Y'all like us thinking of u as sexual objects,don't y'all?ADMIT IT!! :imp :p
just because women dress to killl does not mean they want to be treated as sex objects.most women who dress sexily,dress that way simply because they want to feel good.it' s like wearing sexy lingerie,i don't wear it just cos i really want anybody see it,i wear it cos it makes me feel sexy.
besides it's not our fault if we have sexy curves,it's just natural and you don't expect us to dress in sacks do you?
 

peace0478

Active Member
#6
vince said:
SEX!!!
Are we the only one?
What about the female gender?What do y'all think first when u lay ya eyes on some sexy dude?I WANNA HAVE HIS BABY!!As if that is not sex!!Hehehe!!
Seriously though,what is wrong with men seeing women as sexual objects?They do dress themselves up as such,don't they.
Y'all put us guys under serious pressure sometimes with all them sensuous bodily protrusions ala:
a)Boobs sticking out like a "one way" signboard.
b)Booties sticking out and wiggling at the back.
c)Maddeningly sensuously curvatious hips.
Y'all push these sinful anatomical landscape in our face and u expect us to think of something else but SEX.
TUFFIAKWA!!
Y'all like us thinking of u as sexual objects,don't y'all?ADMIT IT!! :imp :p
I don begin dey worry about you o. BigM abeg straighten this man out now, chei.
 

vince

Well-Known Member
#9
peace0478 said:
I don begin dey worry about you o. BigM abeg straighten this man out now, chei.
I was not talking about me,but about men in general.
You these women,una too dey front! :imp
 

vince

Well-Known Member
#11
toyin said:
Thank you jare sistah Peace, Vince you no be man :p
Wetin i be then?
All this talk about you women dressing up to kill just to feel good is all crap!
Y'all dress sexy and all to have men ogle you!Y'all get a kick out of being ogled,why all this fronting stuff. :imp
 

toyin

Active Member
#12
There isn't anyone who doesn't like being admired but it isn't fronting as you put it. I like to be admired but not ogled.
 

Lafem

Well-Known Member
#13
You females amuse me. I wanna truly believe that some of you all aren't as naive as you sound. Come on. BY NATURE, a woman's body, particularly when she's naked, or atleast scantily dressed, arouses a man. That's a biological given. Some women may think that when they dress 'sexy' that they're doing it just coz they want to 'feel sexy', but the simply truth is that, the unintended consequence of doing so is that, in the process, such females are encouraging, whether consciously or not, men to ogle/lust at them. And men that do so aren't 'weak', so to speak, rather, they're just responding to their natural inclination in the face of such a sight. God put such feelings in men to express them towards their own wives and intimately in the confines of their homes/bedroom. But when a woman publicly exposes her flesh, she is in effect sharing that intimacy with all men in public. And saying or expecting men in general to 'control themselves' or not 'ogle' at you for dressing in that manner, is the height of hypocrisy and delusion. This is a simple matter of cause and effect. It's just like you deliberately waving your food and eating it in front of a hungry man. Look, if you keep doing that and expect him to stay 'disciplined' or control himself, you're deceiving yourself. The least he'll do is wish he can have some piece of your food too! that's if he doesn't beat you up and grab it, or grab a piece of it while you're not looking. And another simple truth is that, a lot of women that dress scantily do so for the attention they end up getting, i.e they want to be lusted at. A woman can dress attractively and modestly, without arousing such feelings in men, and commanding admiration and engendering pure thoughts towards her. But if you want to dress scantily, don't blame guys for ogling lustily at you.
 

bluestocking

Well-Known Member
#15
Lafem said:
You females amuse me. I wanna truly believe that some of you all aren't as naive as you sound. Come on. BY NATURE, a woman's body, particularly when she's naked, or atleast scantily dressed, arouses a man. That's a biological given. Some women may think that when they dress 'sexy' that they're doing it just coz they want to 'feel sexy', but the simply truth is that, the unintended consequence of doing so is that, in the process, such females are encouraging, whether consciously or not, men to ogle/lust at them. And men that do so aren't 'weak', so to speak, rather, they're just responding to their natural inclination in the face of such a sight. God put such feelings in men to express them towards their own wives and intimately in the confines of their homes/bedroom. But when a woman publicly exposes her flesh, she is in effect sharing that intimacy with all men in public. And saying or expecting men in general to 'control themselves' or not 'ogle' at you for dressing in that manner, is the height of hypocrisy and delusion. This is a simple matter of cause and effect. It's just like you deliberately waving your food and eating it in front of a hungry man. Look, if you keep doing that and expect him to stay 'disciplined' or control himself, you're deceiving yourself. The least he'll do is wish he can have some piece of your food too! that's if he doesn't beat you up and grab it, or grab a piece of it while you're not looking. And another simple truth is that, a lot of women that dress scantily do so for the attention they end up getting, i.e they want to be lusted at. A woman can dress attractively and modestly, without arousing such feelings in men, and commanding admiration and engendering pure thoughts towards her. But if you want to dress scantily, don't blame guys for ogling lustily at you.
the thing that makes a man higher than animal is his ability to curb/control his wild instincts,if a man can't do that, then what diffferentiates him from an animal.
modesty in dressing is a relative thing.don't forget that wearing clothes is not an african thing,it was brought by the whiteman.our foremothers,never used to wear clothes and nobody ever raped them and i'm sure they were not ogled at too. there are still african socities where women go about scantily clad,are you trying to say that these women ought to be raped for going about half naked?
brother,it's all in your mind.if you see a sister 'scantily clad',look the other way!!!
 

Lafem

Well-Known Member
#16
bluestocking said:
the thing that makes a man higher than animal is his ability to curb/control his wild instincts,if a man can't do that, then what diffferentiates him from an animal.
Some of you women can be so hypocritical sometimes eh, it's unbelievable. On the one hand, you accuse men of double-standards, when in truth, you also just want an opportunity to impose your own double-standards on the male gender. But in the meantime, you all try to play the 'moral minority' role, though [as is with all humans], you oftentimes expose your true motives. To really tackle this issue, we must approach it from both the moral and biological angles, coz if you try only to treat it from a moral vantage point, while neglecting some biological realities, and vice versa, we'll not get to the crux of the matter. Biologically, men and women were created differently to serve different purposes. I don't want to waste much time or space in going through these biological/psychological/physical differences. This aspect of their being has nothing to do with morality, o.k? The topic at hand has more to do with men's natural/biologically programmed responses to the sight of a [naked] female body, and not necessarily about the morality of such responses. Just because women don't react the same way as men do when it comes to sex doesn't make them morally superior.


bluestocking said:
modesty in dressing is a relative thing.


Well, you can keep believing that while neglecting the realities out there. Most, if not all, men can recognize a modestly dressed woman as opposed to one who's scantily clad, and that affects their reactions and responses to both groups of females. Come, I have a question for you females. Why is it that some of you seem to get your dress senses from stippers, females in music videos, and prostitutes? Coz, I remember that it used to be prostitutes that dressed scantily, back in the days, to get the attention of male potential customers. But nawadays, it's hard to tell which is which anymore, based on the way some women dress, yet they claim they don't want undue attention, even though they're well aware of the kinds of attention such clothing generate. What sort of arrogance is that? Why do you all wanna look like them, even though you know why they dress that way? Could it be that you guys also want guys' attention, even if not on the same scale as these women of easy virtue? I'm confused.


bluestocking said:
don't forget that wearing clothes is not an african thing,it was brought by the whiteman.our foremothers,never used to wear clothes and nobody ever raped them and i'm sure they were not ogled at too.
And who told you women never got raped in the days of our forefathers and foremothers, or that they weren't ogled at? Were you there? My friend, our forefathers are really no different than we their descendants o, wake up and smell the coffee. Infact sef, a lot of us have even appreciated than they were back then, character wise, in many areas. Or are you trying to suggest that rape is a recent phenomenon or that it came with the whiteman introduction of dressing?? Listen, humans are humans everywhere, irrespective of geographical location -- and human nature, since the beginning of time, has remained CONSTANT, without changing [it only adapts itself to new conditions or environments, but it's still inherently the same, irrespective of time, age, year]. Humans are all created by the same Maker, who wired them with certain inherent impulses, for specially designed purposes. One of those impulses includes that of a man's [not woman] natural inclination towards a naked female body/frame. It's a known fact that men and women respond DIFFERENTLY to sexual stimulus. For a man, he can get aroused within seconds, while a woman may take much longer to reach full stage of arousal. THAT IS BY INTELLIGENT DESIGN MY FRIEND! Also, women don't generally respond to seeing bare-chested men the same way men respond to seeing bare-chested women. Listen, that's not becos men can't control themselves. CAPITAL NO!! And that doesn't mean that women who don't become sexually aroused at the mere sight of a bare-chested man can exercise more self-control than their male counterparts. The man's chest isn't a sex organ as the woman's is! It's all in the biology of both sexes.


bluestocking said:

there are still african socities where women go about scantily clad,are you trying to say that these women ought to be raped for going about half naked?
I'm not saying women is such societies should be raped, but I'm sure some of them do get raped, or willingly give themselves over to their male suitors -- coz at the end of the day, their men are still men, like other men. Something has to give my friend -- you can't keep flaunting all that body, and naturally expect them not to 'want some', their men aren't more 'moral' or have more 'self-control' than we that cover-up. On the contrary, it's in such societies that one would find a preponderance of the practise of polygamy. I've read about quite a few african societies where the natives still run around naked, and believe me, they're usually VERY VERY promiscious, both the males and the females.


bluestocking said:
brother,it's all in your mind.if you see a sister 'scantily clad',look the other way!!!


Wake up and smell the coffee. That 'sister' too is just as guilty as the man staring at her, coz whether she realizes it or not, she's tempting him to lust after her.
 
#17
We should make this like a debate, you know like we used to do in primary and secondary school. Bluestocking can represent women and Lafem can represent guys. So let's see who will be able to convince us and not confuse us that women love to be ogled at.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.