1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Sony announces Kick-a$$ Camera!!

Discussion in 'FILMMAKING, INDUSTRY, TECHNOLOGY' started by Village-Boi, Apr 3, 2012.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. vince

    vince Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2003
    Messages:
    25,208
    Likes Received:
    274
    When it comes to cameras, i am very confused these days. Once upon a time, it used to be a lot easier.
     
  2. Village-Boi

    Village-Boi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,018
    Likes Received:
    527
    Oh tell me about it... the good ol' days! Now it's rocket science... ok, a bit cheaper but still rocket science!
     
  3. Village-Boi

    Village-Boi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,018
    Likes Received:
    527
    The 'stock' lenses be it the 14-42mm or 14-140mm are not that bad; the only problem is they start at f3.5 and shift to f5.6 during a zoom (I have not verified the shift on Panny, but I'm very sure they do). The bad news is all stock lenses are generally rubbish for low-light filming. The 20mm f1.7 will give you a ton more light at night, having said that, if you use a LOT of light or shoot in bright daylight you'll be ok with any of the stock lenses.
     
  4. Field Marshal

    Field Marshal ABSOLUTE SUPREME RULER

    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2006
    Messages:
    12,562
    Likes Received:
    289
    Exactly my situation now! So very true!!
     
  5. Village-Boi

    Village-Boi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,018
    Likes Received:
    527
    Same dilema I am facing. All of the sub 10K cameras do different things well... none cover 'everything' one wants. And the bigger badder toys are way beyond 'reasonable' reach.
     
  6. Village-Boi

    Village-Boi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,018
    Likes Received:
    527
    UPDATE: It's $15,000 for the unavailable Canon 4K HDSLR... oh and it's rubbish 4K... and (possibly) $35,000 for their 'drawing-board' but 'real' 4K camera. Back to the HDSLR - it's still a freaking stills camera - who in their right 'indie' mind will pay 15Gs for that? It's NOT a Hasselblad or Leica! Canon just get dumber and Dumber. The Canon 5D Mk II was an accident a total fluke! Idiots!!!! Hissssssssss!!!!!!!!
     
  7. Village-Boi

    Village-Boi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,018
    Likes Received:
    527
    Kala you see these people them wahala? Things move fast and now RED hit back with the successor to the MX sensor - the 6K 'Dragon' sensor.

    It's funny... the TV broadcast world is still struggling with simple 'true HD' and I bet in 3 or 4yrs there will be 'true' 8K recording.
     
  8. moviewizard

    moviewizard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Messages:
    9,507
    Likes Received:
    331
    So VB, how much is this new Sony "kick-ass' new camera? Am planning on getting something a bit affordable to help me practice and work with but then i want to stay away from the CANON's. Apart from the fact that everyone is using it, i am yet to see a film shot with it that looks different. I love my film to look good, but not in-organic like the CANON and most DSLR's do.

    I don't know much about this new camera but from the description you have given it, it sounds good. Is it different from the new 'black-magic' camera you posted recently?
     
  9. Village-Boi

    Village-Boi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,018
    Likes Received:
    527
    I think it will be less than $10,000 in the US some say it might be around the $8,500 mark which is a pretty amazing price considering the 'features' - do note that 4K recording will cost much more... but how many people are ever going to 'need' to shoot in 4K? The frame rates right out of the box are worth that much and immediate 'true' 1080 I think.

    For real bro Canon have gone down the route of greed... their 'kinda' 4K DSLR is $15,000!!!!!! (It's still a freaking 'stills' cam... 15G's my a$$ - freaking idiots) They have set their eyes on Hollywood since the 'Nov 3' announcement of the C300. So for me it's goodbye Canon. Oh and their C500 will be $35,000.

    The Sony camera is very different from the BlackMagic camera in that the BlackMagic shoots RAW. I will do a more techie post on what's what in the camera world later during the week that simplifies and explains 'general' stuff.

    Are you looking at docos, narrative or stuff that needs quite a bit of VFX?
     
  10. moviewizard

    moviewizard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Messages:
    9,507
    Likes Received:
    331


    Thanks bro. I really appreciate it. Am looking to make shorts with it, as many shorts as i can. Narrattives yes, no VFX for me yet till i can at least get a hack of what and what to do but it would be nice if the camera is flexible just incase i get to that route soon.

    We use a Panasonic HMC 150 for our digital shoots in school which is pretty cool too. But i want something more handy, gives the film look and very functional with colors to an extent. You do know the CANON's can only take a maximum amount of light since the camera itself can film in low light which for me i don't like since i do like to be able to determine how much light goes into a shot.
     
  11. Village-Boi

    Village-Boi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,018
    Likes Received:
    527
    Ok, if you're looking at shorts (for now) you will be thinking of a large sensor camera. I will touch on the first paragraph in the 'Camera World' thread.

    The Panny HMC150 isn't a bad camera but with a 1/3 chip you'll never get a 'filmic' look unless you -
    A) stand 5miles from your subject and zoom all the way in
    B) Use a 35mm adapter - negates the point in this day and age; 4yrs ago YES, today NO!

    Seriously, if you don't yet own a camera and want to shoot 'shorts' or even a 'feature' (depending) go all out 'indie' and get the hang of a DSLR.

    On the second part of your second paragraph I try to explain what I think you were saying/asking -

    Not just Canon but DSLRs in general are very good for lowlight shooting BUT because they are we tend to forget we SHOULD still light scenes - even 'dark' scenes.
    DSLRs are cheap and can deliver a very 'filmic' look straight out-of-the-box even with the crappiest, cheapest lens on the planet.
    All light going into any camera can and should be controlled by the 'shooter' - DSLRs do NOT have built in ND filters so having a 'Vari-ND' is practically a must if shooting in bright dylight (the link is reference sample ONLY as you can see they come in various sizes depending on the lens you want to use).

    One problem some people run into is not using the 180 dgree shutter speed rule which is can make video look really weird when using DSLRs (and other cams too). So in bright daylight you need a way to shoot at the 'apeture' YOU want (depending on the look you are going for) and a way to cut down the light going into the camera. For stills there is no problem changing the shutter speed but for video - that is a problem!

    You're in the US at the moment right? That's NTSC land - you guys shoot 30p & 60p because the electricity there is 60Hz. UK and Nigeria are pal so we shoot 25p & 50p as 50Hz electricity. Same thing goes for 'interlaced' rates. For a cinema film you'd most probably be shooting at 24p.
    So back to the lght thing you can change your shutter speed in 'mulitples' of the rate for whatever country you are shooting in... especially if you notice 'flicker' from the artificial lights.
    The 180 degree rule applies to video/film in that shutter speed is approx twice the value of your frame rate. So let's say you are shooting 24fps then the selected shutter speed on your camera should be 1/48th but many cameras dont do that... the next closest is 1/50th. If your shooting 30fps (NTSC) then your shutter speed is 1/60th - this 'rule' keeps a 'filmic' look. Again the problem is, especially with DSLRs, how to keep that rule with your chosen appeture in bright daylight? The sole reason every DSLR shooter should always have a Vari-ND. It solves the light issue you were talking about.

    Hopefully that's what you meant??

    DSLRs do have a big learning curve if you want to use them very well. I think they are worth it because we have never been able to get a 'filmic' look out of ANY camera for 'peanuts'.
    And also remember 'dual-system' sound is a must too!
     
  12. moviewizard

    moviewizard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Messages:
    9,507
    Likes Received:
    331


    I agree with you. I was referring to all DSLR's in my statements and not just canon. I used canon as a reference since almost everyone and anyone i have seen owns and uses a canon 5D, 7D etc. But its all good, i get your point exactly.

    Thanks for the enlightenment. Am not very good with camera variations and just learning about the peculiarities of each ones. Will take your notes seriously, thanks.
     
  13. Village-Boi

    Village-Boi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,018
    Likes Received:
    527
    You're welcome. If you can, try to get some practice with the DSLR your friend has; play around with all the settings both on the camera and the lens... say what you did into the mic and when you play the footage back you'll learn what various things do.

    Lol, don't worry about the Canon thing. A lot of shooters when 'upgrading' will shift base as Canon seems to be hell bent on going down the Hollywood route... ONLY!!
     
  14. moviewizard

    moviewizard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2003
    Messages:
    9,507
    Likes Received:
    331


    Noted! Sure will!!!
     
  15. Village-Boi

    Village-Boi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,018
    Likes Received:
    527
    Sony FS700 price announced!

    The fantastic FS700 is priced at $7,999! That is pretty amazing for what it does NOW and will be able to do in the future.

    Here is an interesting recent review

    For those that want to know more about what's up in the camera world or want to chat about cameras please join this thread. Thanks.
     
  16. Village-Boi

    Village-Boi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,018
    Likes Received:
    527
    I am liking this camera more and more.

    A straight to the point review.

    Also it is the first Large sensor camera that has 'useable' auto-focus; documentary filmmakers should love that (ok it only works with Sony Alpha lenses). This camera is like a glove that fits more than one hand... nice... actually even nicer.

    Auto-focus video
     
  17. Village-Boi

    Village-Boi Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2009
    Messages:
    5,018
    Likes Received:
    527
    Hmmmmmm ok so the 4K recorder that this amazing FS700 camera (and new ones coming) will use is the 'R5 SR Recorder' and will cost something like $19,000?? Well FS700 owners will def not be buying it. Maybe 'rentals' and the owners of the soon to come ($22-$25,000) F5 camera that is to be a direct RED Epic competitor. We await more news.

    EDIT: Sorry peeps, wrong info - The Sony F5 is a canon C300/C500/RED Scarlet competitor while the Sony F55 is the RED Epic target.
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page